| Join Our Mailing List |
H.R. 4662 - Medicare Lymphedema Treatment Bill Officially Introduced
9th NLN International Conference Sept 22 - 26, 2010
Weight Lifting and LE: Clearing Up Misconceptions
NLN Position Papers: Risk Reduction, Treatment, Exercise, Air Travel, Training
Financial Assistance for Garments:
New Books:
100 Questions and Answers About Lymphedema
Lymphedema Management: A Comprehensive Guide for Practitioners
Updated NLN Online Patient Questionnaire
By Robert (Bob) Weiss, MS, LE Legislative Advocate
Compression Garments Used In Lymphedema Treatment Meet Medicare Definition of Prosthetic Devices
On February 20, 2008 a Medicare Administration Appeals Judge affirmed an earlier Administrative Law Judge's determination that compression garments used as part of the medical treatment of lymphedema meet the definition of “prosthetic devices” in the Social Security Act, and are coverable by Medicare.
This most recent case follows two earlier cases where the Appeals Council reversed two different ALJs who supported providers who denied reimbursement based on the unsubstantiated claim that compression garments “were not covered by Medicare”. Three other ALJs decided in favor of three different Medicare Beneficiaries, finding that the compression bandages, sleeves, stockings, devices and directional flow garments were medically necessary and coverable in the treatment of lymphedema as “prosthetic devices”.
Unfortunately these cases are not precedent-setting, and there is no desire by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to change their medically unsound policies. CMS has also recently denied a formal request to change their HCPCS Coding manual to recognize the function of these items in the treatment of lymphedema, and to code them as prosthetic devices.
What actions can be taken to move CMS into action?
Every denial of compression bandages or compression garments must be appealed by the patient. The procedures for appeal are found in the denial letter. The appeal process will involve a redetermination appeal and a reconsideration appeal to Medicare Administrative Contractors, who will side with the denial, and then to an Administrative Law Judge where a fair hearing can be obtained.
Every lymphedema supply manufacturer must make a formal request to CMS for a recoding of their products with an “L-Code” as prosthetic devices when used in the treatment of lymphedema.
And every affected citizen, whether suffering for or at risk for lymphedema must write his of her Congress Member requesting that CMS revise their policies to cover the treatment of lymphedema according to current standards. Since CMS has refused repeatedly to even consider a change, urge your legislator to consider sponsoring the proposed “Lymphedema Diagnosis and Treatment Cost-Saving Act” which has been presented to legislators over the last 5 years.
I am prepared to help in all these matters, and have materials which will be helpful. Please contact Robert Weiss at: LymphActivist@aol.com
Robert "Bob" Weiss, M.S.
NLN LE Legislative Advocate
About Us | Privacy Policy |
Contact Us
©2010 National Lymphedema Network. All rights reserved.
Permission to print and duplicate this page for personal and educational purposes only, not for sale. Reprint Permission Request Form (pdf format, 86kb). For more information, call 415-908-3681.
